By Leslie Goldberg
Wouldn’t you know it? It’s the health food freaks, the almond milk guzzlers who are fueling California’s water shortage. Did you know that it takes a whole gallon of water to raise one almond?
A whole gallon.
Those self-righteous vegans who think they know something!
Since I happened to have a pound of almonds in the refrigerator I decided to count up those little water suckers and see how much water it takes to produce a pound of almonds. It was bad. Four hundred and thirty-three gallons of water.
Four hundred and thirty-three? Wait a minute. How about a pound of beef? (I dare say it’s a lot easier to eat a pound of beef than it is to eat a pound of almonds.) According to the folks at waterfootprint.org it takes between 3,000 and 5,000 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef.
“More than half the entire US water supply goes to livestock,” says the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
“It takes a lot of water to grow grain, forage, and roughage to feed a cow, as well as water to drink and to service the cow,” says the US Geological Survey Water Science School.
“Meat processing, especially chicken, also uses large amounts of water,” says the Environmental Working Group.
“The more plant-based foods we eat versus animal-based foods….the less water, energy, and other natural resources we use,” says the San Francisco Water Sewer.
If animal foods are such a big deal in terms of water usage, why, why, why did the New York Times, in their recent mega two-part series on California’s drought, not mention animal foods? Why did they instead focus on the water required to grow almonds?
I have four suspicions.
1) The reporters, like practically everyone on the planet, consider animal food eating “normal, natural and necessary.” (Thank you author of “Why we Love Dogs, Eat Pigs and Wear Cows,” Melanie Joy.)
2) They consider almonds to be maybe normal and natural, but definitely not necessary.
3) It’s kind of a sexy angle to zero in on almonds – almonds seem so innocent, but now we find they’re evil. (“Hey! Did you read this? It’s almonds that are using up all our water.”)
4) Pressure from the animal food industry, particularly the dairy farms which have been facing a serious challenge from the almond milk industry.
One of the big things The New York Times drought stories didn’t mention was water pollution, which by the way, is a rather large water suck. Turns out, according to the EPA, the animal foods industry is THE biggest cause of water pollution in the United States.
California’s Central Valley, which is dominated by huge dairy farms, has suffered serious ground water pollution caused primarily by cow waste. A study by the central valley water board found that 40 percent of the dairies in that area – more than 550 facilities – reported that they had nitrate levels in their own wells of at least twice the drinking water standard and it’s become a health threat to those who have the misfortune of living nearby, especially babies and pregnant women.
No, the Brita won’t take out nitrates.
Also I have to say, that’s an interesting concept: “their own wells.”
When it comes to water pollution, nobody’s talking about almonds as far as I can tell. Still, California is producing a lot of almonds, most of which are exported abroad. I’ve read that 10 percent of California’s water supply is going to raise almonds. And 47 percent of California’s water is going to livestock, according to a December 2012 report by the Pacific Institute, titled “California’s Water Footprint.”
I won’t say whether anybody should drink almond milk or not. I will say, though, people should eat (one of my favorites) lentils instead of meat.
“By making one meal a week with lentils instead of beef, a family of four can save the equivalent of 17 bathtubs of water,” says Oxfam International.
Seventeen bathtubs. One meal.
PS: Despite the holes in their story, the New York Times reporters do deserve some credit though for finding possibly the most intellectually challenged man in the entire state to give his reaction on the water crisis: “I’m not going to stop watering,” said Matthew Post, 45, referring to the gardens around his Benedict Canyon home. “The state does not know how to arrange the resources they have, and so we have to pay for it,” he said. “They say that they will raise the prices because there is a drought, but when the drought ends, will they reduce the prices?”
Ok, fine, Mat, but how about cutting down on the burgers?
– A Vicious Vegan blog post –
11 thoughts on “YUP, IT’S VEGANS WHO HAVE CAUSED THE CALIFORNIA DROUGHT”
Love the article. It’s getting so old hearing all the talk of drought and no one pointing out what’s really causing it. Meat and dairy are completely unnecessary and killing the environment as well as the population. It’s ridiculous and maddening.
Thanks Christina. As usual, it feels like we’re living in an alternative universe from the “real world.”
I’ve heard a cow saying drought is humans’ fault.
It isn’t so long time that there even has been a milk industry.
People don’t need milk (cow milk) It’s actually harmful to you.
It’s just a huge money transfer trough government from taxpayers to the few-riches.
There was an document about these facts but cant remember what it was..maybe “food matters”
BRAVO! What a thoughtful, well-researched article that you appropriately infused with humor. I hope the NY Times runs this, too.
According to this webpage http://blog.foodnetwork.com/healthyeats/2013/04/21/how-many-almonds-in-a-serving/
it takes 23 almonds to make a serving. That requires about 25 gallons of water.
A typical serving of beef (1/4 lb) requires about 110 gallons of water.
That means it takes more than 4 times the amount of water for a serving of beef as it does for a serving of almonds.
Excellent analysis. I’d actually like to take it a little further. I always like to look at food costs in terms of what it would take to sustain a human for a day, based on the USDA average of 2000 calories. In those terms, it would take 0.76 pounds of almonds to give you 2000 calories in a day. That would require almost 330 gallons of water to produce. On the other hand, it would take 1.32 pounds of ground beef to give you 2000 calories. That would require just over 5,313 gallons of water to produce. So a person subsisting on a diet of beef would require more than 16 times the amount of water than a person subsisting on a diet of almonds.
I have heard this idea that almonds are causing all the woes espoused by a person I know, saying it would be better to drink cow’s milk. I just laughed. Good post.
“Seventeen bathtubs. One meal.” Well, 52 meals actually, but your point is still well taken.
The 47 percent water footprint number includes water used to produce imports of dairy and meat into California. The amount of actual CA Water used to grow livestock feed crops is less but still significant. 18%,12%, and 7% of all CA Water devoted to agriculture is used to grow alfalfa, irrigated pasture, and corn (most of which is converted into silage and fed to dairy cows). These are 2005 numbers, but there are still over 1.5 million acres likely to be devoted to alfalfa and corn production in California this year. I think it is better politically to use the actual CA water use numbers than the water footprint numbers. The latter are easily misinterpreted and can be used by our opponents to assert that we are exaggerating our case.
lol it takes 1,600 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef